Tuesday, March 20, 2018
CST 361s - Week 3
This week I began contact with my partner CalGE. I will be working with two students who are a part of my cohort in this project. The project itself sounds quite interesting as we are going to build a place for summer camp attendees to put their personal information in and to keep track of their attendance and hours at the camp. I sent in the Agreement and hope to finish that. My proposal draft is under way and I will hopefully finish that and be caught up in coursework soon. I am looking forward to working alongside my teammates and building the best program we can.
Monday, March 12, 2018
CST 361s - Week 2
This week I continued my search for a service learning partner, my Professor and TA are aiding me in finding a virtual volunteer opportunity due to personal circumstances. I am hoping to find a site soon to begin the process of the project. I am hoping to take picture of whatever Partner I will be aiding, and perhaps a picture of any of the individuals helped by my contribution. I would also probably take pictures or videos of skills that I will need to either learn or practice more in order to complete the project. I enjoyed going through this weeks reading and videos as well as our reflective work on our and our family’s history with technology. It was interesting to work on the Forum, as I was a member of the moderation team for this week’s discussion. I enjoyed many of the responses and was excited that the questions we formed were fostering a rather engaging discussion.
Tuesday, March 6, 2018
CST 361s - Week 1
My search for a Service Learning Partner has continued into this week as I am having trouble finding one to fit into my shortened schedule. Hopefully I will hear back from some of my inquiries and find a partner soon. This week was interesting in coursework as we looked into the history of racial segregation with regards to swimming and how that has had echoes into the modern era. We studied how these earlier injustices have had a ripple effect on minority communities that has resulted in a decreased representation in the swimming arena. It was interesting to consider how the relatively young area of Computer Science has appears to have had a racial gap grow into it as well, and to ponder what the causes of such a gap could be. I hope to have my learning partner soon and to get started in my service soon.
Tuesday, February 20, 2018
Scrapbook 8 - CST 373
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2018/02/15/instagram-criticised-gives-russian-censorship-demands/
Summary:
Instagram recently complied with a request by the Russian government to remove a video posted on their platform. The video posted online by an activist group purportedly showed a Russian oligarch meeting with a high-ranking member of the Russian government in a discussion on US relations. A Russian court ruled that it was a violation of the individuals involved right to privacy and as such asked instagram to take it off of their platform. Instagram complied stating that they attempt to follow any local laws or rulings regarding regulation in general.
The reason this article was chosen:
This article was chosen as it showcases how national governments may be able to still censor and regulate content they wish to restrict even in the era of the greatest flow of information ever achieved. While the internet opens up the tool for opposition and anti-corruption activists to network and agitate online, major internet-based companies complying with censorship demands may stifle the ability of these groups to utilize the internet to project their ideas and opinions.
Credibility of sources:
The Telegraph is a well known UK-based news publication.
Ethical implications:
As the internet opens up more and more opportunities to connect people and spread differing views and opinions globally, will the censorship imposed by state actors stifle any changes for the better? Should internet-based companies attempt to oppose nations who demand censorship in pursuit of the ideal of freedom of speech, or comply and practically silence dissenters?
Summary:
Instagram recently complied with a request by the Russian government to remove a video posted on their platform. The video posted online by an activist group purportedly showed a Russian oligarch meeting with a high-ranking member of the Russian government in a discussion on US relations. A Russian court ruled that it was a violation of the individuals involved right to privacy and as such asked instagram to take it off of their platform. Instagram complied stating that they attempt to follow any local laws or rulings regarding regulation in general.
The reason this article was chosen:
This article was chosen as it showcases how national governments may be able to still censor and regulate content they wish to restrict even in the era of the greatest flow of information ever achieved. While the internet opens up the tool for opposition and anti-corruption activists to network and agitate online, major internet-based companies complying with censorship demands may stifle the ability of these groups to utilize the internet to project their ideas and opinions.
Credibility of sources:
The Telegraph is a well known UK-based news publication.
Ethical implications:
As the internet opens up more and more opportunities to connect people and spread differing views and opinions globally, will the censorship imposed by state actors stifle any changes for the better? Should internet-based companies attempt to oppose nations who demand censorship in pursuit of the ideal of freedom of speech, or comply and practically silence dissenters?
Tuesday, February 13, 2018
Scrapbook 7 - CST 373
https://www.bloomberg.com/view/articles/2017-07-11/china-may-be-raising-the-great-firewall-too-high
Summary:
While China is known for restricting its citizens’ access to certain information and opinions, it has historically turned a blind-eye to the use of VPNs to bypass their famous “great firewall”. In the past, this ignoring of Chinese people bypassing their restrictions was justified by the thought that only affluent and productive individuals would need use of the VPNs in order to access scientific information, news, or other knowledge inaccessible through the country’s internet infrastructure. However, China has recently decided that they will be shutting down VPNs across the country, thereby destroying one of the most popular ways to bypass the screen of state censorship.
The reason this article was chosen:
While China did blockade most of its users from utilizing much of the world-wide web, there were ways to work around the shutdown and access outside information that was not state-sanctioned.
Credibility of sources:
Bloomberg is a well known and respected media outlet regarding finances, news, and technology.
Ethical implications:
This increase in the amount of censorship that will be established over China will greatly affect the amount of information and opinion available to its people. While the middle and upper classes used to be able to access necessary information through bypassing the “great firewall”, now Chinese citizens may be even more cut-off from the rest of the world and unable to learn or broadcast dissident thought and feelings.
Summary:
While China is known for restricting its citizens’ access to certain information and opinions, it has historically turned a blind-eye to the use of VPNs to bypass their famous “great firewall”. In the past, this ignoring of Chinese people bypassing their restrictions was justified by the thought that only affluent and productive individuals would need use of the VPNs in order to access scientific information, news, or other knowledge inaccessible through the country’s internet infrastructure. However, China has recently decided that they will be shutting down VPNs across the country, thereby destroying one of the most popular ways to bypass the screen of state censorship.
The reason this article was chosen:
While China did blockade most of its users from utilizing much of the world-wide web, there were ways to work around the shutdown and access outside information that was not state-sanctioned.
Credibility of sources:
Bloomberg is a well known and respected media outlet regarding finances, news, and technology.
Ethical implications:
This increase in the amount of censorship that will be established over China will greatly affect the amount of information and opinion available to its people. While the middle and upper classes used to be able to access necessary information through bypassing the “great firewall”, now Chinese citizens may be even more cut-off from the rest of the world and unable to learn or broadcast dissident thought and feelings.
Tuesday, February 6, 2018
Scrapbook 6 - CST 373
/http://www.latimes.com/business/hollywood/la-fi-ct-netflix-dragon-box-piracy-20180111-story.html
Summary:
Netflix and Amazon have joined a few major Hollywood studios in a lawsuit against the media streaming product Dragon Box. Dragon Box utilizes Kodi software which allows for third-party add-ons that provide easy access to free, pirated materials. While the Kodi software and Dragon Box itself are not illegal, they are accused in the lawsuit of facilitating piracy by making access to pirated material very easy for their clients. The argument is mainly based around the fact that Dragon Box was advertised as a product that would allow for users to leave subscription services such a Netflix and Hulu. Dragon Box officials have responded by saying that they can not be held responsible as the software is simply accessing readily available content online.
The reason this article was chosen:
This article was chosen as it pertains to our discussion this week on issues of copying another's work, as well as highlights the issues with the negative, albeit not direct, consequences creating certain programs can have.
Credibility of sources:
The Los Angeles Times is a long standing and well-respected news source.
Ethical implications:
Dragon Box, and other streaming services that utilize Kodi software, allow people to easily access content available online that may be pirated from its original source. Is the enabling of copyright infringement through the use of one’s product just as unethical as performing the copyright infringement oneself? Or should the fact that the pirated material is simply easily accessible to the Dragon Box’s algorithm make the unauthorized streaming of shows an unfortunate side effect of the reach of the internet?
Summary:
Netflix and Amazon have joined a few major Hollywood studios in a lawsuit against the media streaming product Dragon Box. Dragon Box utilizes Kodi software which allows for third-party add-ons that provide easy access to free, pirated materials. While the Kodi software and Dragon Box itself are not illegal, they are accused in the lawsuit of facilitating piracy by making access to pirated material very easy for their clients. The argument is mainly based around the fact that Dragon Box was advertised as a product that would allow for users to leave subscription services such a Netflix and Hulu. Dragon Box officials have responded by saying that they can not be held responsible as the software is simply accessing readily available content online.
The reason this article was chosen:
This article was chosen as it pertains to our discussion this week on issues of copying another's work, as well as highlights the issues with the negative, albeit not direct, consequences creating certain programs can have.
Credibility of sources:
The Los Angeles Times is a long standing and well-respected news source.
Ethical implications:
Dragon Box, and other streaming services that utilize Kodi software, allow people to easily access content available online that may be pirated from its original source. Is the enabling of copyright infringement through the use of one’s product just as unethical as performing the copyright infringement oneself? Or should the fact that the pirated material is simply easily accessible to the Dragon Box’s algorithm make the unauthorized streaming of shows an unfortunate side effect of the reach of the internet?
Tuesday, January 30, 2018
Scrapbook 5 - CST 373
https://gizmodo.com/did-design-really-cause-hawaiis-ballistic-missile-threa-1822417863
Summary:
The recent mishap of a false incoming missile strike warning being sent to all cell phones in the state of Hawaii may have been due in part to the fault of the designer, some argue. While it was a user error that caused the accidental broadcasting of the horrifying message of an imminent attack, some argue that the recently released example of the user interface utilized shows that user error was only partially to blame, as the design was severely lacking. Designers have weighed in online stating that the bare-bones design was confusing and unclear as to what would trigger a test broadcast and what would actually broadcast the warning message, thus placing some of the blame for the incident on the initial designer and their work.
The reason this article was chosen:
This article was chosen as this week we looked into the responsibility of the programmer when working and designing products. Since we primarily focused on the ethical implications of the a designers responsibility, this article highlights a real world example in which the designer’s lack of foresight and user experience may have caused a state-wide panic.
Credibility of sources:
Gizmodo is a widely circulated and well known technology blog.
Ethical implications:
When is it okay to shrug off the blame of even obviously user-induced errors onto the design of a program. If the design is needlessly complicated for the average user, is it really the user’s fault for failing or should the designer take some of, if not all of the blame?
Summary:
The recent mishap of a false incoming missile strike warning being sent to all cell phones in the state of Hawaii may have been due in part to the fault of the designer, some argue. While it was a user error that caused the accidental broadcasting of the horrifying message of an imminent attack, some argue that the recently released example of the user interface utilized shows that user error was only partially to blame, as the design was severely lacking. Designers have weighed in online stating that the bare-bones design was confusing and unclear as to what would trigger a test broadcast and what would actually broadcast the warning message, thus placing some of the blame for the incident on the initial designer and their work.
The reason this article was chosen:
This article was chosen as this week we looked into the responsibility of the programmer when working and designing products. Since we primarily focused on the ethical implications of the a designers responsibility, this article highlights a real world example in which the designer’s lack of foresight and user experience may have caused a state-wide panic.
Credibility of sources:
Gizmodo is a widely circulated and well known technology blog.
Ethical implications:
When is it okay to shrug off the blame of even obviously user-induced errors onto the design of a program. If the design is needlessly complicated for the average user, is it really the user’s fault for failing or should the designer take some of, if not all of the blame?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)